Nicholas A. Abidi
Current Orthopaedic Practice. May/June 2010. Vol. 21. No. 3. Pp. 258-263

Companies that make joint implants are working with surgeons to find the right materials and design for the first ever successful metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint replacement. The first MTP joint implant was tried back in 1952 and surgeons have continued to modify implant designs to get a functional unit.

With the weight of the body behind every footstep, an artificial joint at the base of the big toe doesn’t hold up very long. Until recently, arthrodesis of the joint has been the favored treatment. Patients suffering pain and joint destruction from trauma, gout, arthritis, and other conditions have had success with arthrodesis.

With an arthrodesis procedure, wires, pins, and plates are used to fix or hold the joint in a locked or fused position. Fusion does limit motion at that joint, which in turn, causes changes in the way a person walks.

Silicone joint replacements have been tried but studies show that patients don’t put weight on the toe. Even with reduced weight-bearing on the silicone implants, they don’t hold up. The implants themselves start to break down and the bone underneath the implant softens and flakes away. Bone spurs form around the area as the body’s response to the changes in toe and foot biomechanics.

Results of the current total toe arthroplasty in use compared with arthrodesis don’t favor the arthroplasty just yet as a long-term solution for joint degeneration of the big toe. Some patients do report decreased pain. But the overall satisfaction rate is only around 77% after five years. That doesn’t begin to compare with the 90% rating for arthrodesis and up to 98% rating for hip or knee replacements.

For those patients willing to try this approach, the implant can always be removed and the toe fused if it doesn’t work out. But there is usually bone loss with this type of revision surgery, so it isn’t done routinely.

The author proposes that the implant science around total toe arthroplasty will continue to evolve and improve. When results are equal to or better than for arthrodesis and when the implant survives 10-years or more, then the metatarsophalangeal implant will be used more often. Improving the implant’s ability to function under normal weight-bearing without loosening is an important goal.