By: 8 June 2018
Improving patient outcomes with smart implants

In the 16th century, broken bones were physically manipulated back to the correct orientation by a bone setter. Failing that, the local blacksmith would step in. Advances in medical treatments mean we no longer need to worry about a blacksmith fixing our broken bones. Here, Matt Parkes, senior medical development engineer at Renishaw and currently working on a collaborative project with Western University in Ontario, Canada, discusses how smart implants are changing the way bone diseases and injuries are treated

The traditional metal implants used to treat bone diseases including osteoarthritis and inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis, as well as in reconstruction therapy, often cause challenges for patients and surgeons. One area currently being developed is smart implants, which improve patient outcomes, bringing the technology into the modern age.

Implants can be smart in two ways, either by being additively manufactured (AM) to produce patient-specific implants (PSIs) from computed tomography (CT) data, or by incorporating sensors.


The challenges with traditional implants

One of the key challenges associated with traditional metal implants is that they are only manufactured in a discrete number of shapes and sizes. Therefore it’s unlikely patients will receive an implant that fits them accurately. This can cause poor physical function and contribute to loosening of the implant.

Poor physical function can also occur because of stress shielding – the process whereby metal implants remove stress from the patient’s bone. The bone responds by reducing in density and therefore becomes weaker.

To combat these issues, researchers and engineers have been developing implants in new ways, using techniques such as AM.


Additive manufacturing

AM has been used as a manufacturing method in the medical field for more than ten years, but the technology is yet to reach its full potential in this industry.

Because AM builds an implant layer by layer, it’s possible to produce PSIs that are a more accurate fit for the patient. The manufacturing method also has fewer geometric constraints than subtractive manufacturing. PSIs designed and manufactured according to a patient’s CT scan encourage the implant to integrate with the patient’s bone, reducing the risk of loosening. As a result, patients are less likely to suffer pain or require revision surgeries.

AM also enables the design of implants that mimic the patient’s bone stiffness, density and trabecular structure, which can reduce stress shielding and improve osseointegration and physical function further.



Still in the early phases of development, implants can also be made smarter by adding sensors. This allows clinicians to accurately measure patient data – the key to evidence-based medicine. One parameter a sensor could measure is temperature, as a raised temperature can indicate an infection before symptoms appear. This could benefit both patients and doctors by enabling treatment before the infection becomes complicated and expensive to treat.

Sensors can also be incorporated into bone reinforcement implants, which are used to help fractures heal. In this example, sensors can measure the strain exerted on the implant, which indicates the extent the fracture has healed. From this information, surgeons can determine the best time to progress the patient to the next stage of therapy and could identify healing problems earlier than currently possible.

By making use of advanced sensor technology, there is now potential for the development of implants that can detect an infection and subsequently secrete the appropriate dose of antibiotic to treat it before it becomes symptomatic. This could reduce the number of patients admitted to hospital.


Changing the face of medicine

The benefits that smart implants have over traditional metal implants could mean that patients will suffer less pain and discomfort, will be less likely to become seriously ill due to infection and could be at lower risk of needing revision surgeries, critical for younger patients.

However, for widespread clinical adoption of smart implants, there are still challenges to overcome. Clinicians must run clinical studies to collect data on the safety and performance the implants offer to patients. This must all be done in line with regulations such as the EU Regulations on Medical Devices. A further key consideration is the processing of personal data in smart implants and how that data is used by the industry and clinicians.

The treatment of bone diseases and injuries has come a long way since the days of bone setters and blacksmiths. Patients can now receive metal implants specifically designed to their individual requirements. Pioneering research institutes are overcoming the hurdles and improving the technology, so the uptake of additively manufactured and data-driven implants is set to rise, improving outcomes for patients and hospitals.